🔗 Share this article

At present, one popular leisure option is a show set in the past portraying Manhattan's elite during a prosperous era. An interesting thread briefly touches on factory laborers going on strike for the concept of “888”: eight hours for work, sleep, and recreation.

This concept was far from groundbreaking during that period. The motto, linked to visionary thinker Robert Owen, originates from 1817. Before that, a 16th-century Spanish ordinance reportedly limited construction workers in the New World to reasonable hours.

What might these historical figures or a Spanish monarch think of “996”? This phrase means being on the job from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., six days out of a week – adding up to 72 hours of relentless effort. Starting in the tech sector in China, 996 was famously labeled a “blessing” by a prominent e-commerce founder. But, Chinese workers objected, mobilizing online and even winning court cases with companies.

Now, 996 has returned – although it persisted all along. Evidence suggests that employees in various sectors face expectations to work 12-hour days. Within tech hubs, adhering to this schedule is considered key to advancement. Employment ads explicitly mention extreme work schedules and indicate that job seekers must be enthusiastic with the opportunity. Talent scouts are instructed that an openness to commit fully is mandatory.

A news source proclaimed that grindcore culture has returned and grindier than ever. An entrepreneur captured the mindset as: “No drinking, no drugs, 996, lift heavy, run far, marry early, track sleep, eat steak and eggs.” A different posted about often being through the weekend and doing their best work late into the night.

Numerous observers find it confusing with this development. Weren't we collectively moved away with overwork? Recent successes from reduced-hour experiments prove that almost every involved firms opted to keep the alternative arrangement. Observing global examples, progressive approaches to work that harmonize family, community, life and work may not hurt output and can create improved well-being.

For instance of the Netherlands, which has a typical working week is about 32 hours. Although they work less, the nation is economically outperforming its peers and stands fifth in the most recent global well-being index.

Moreover, reports indicate of a shift away from career obsession, especially among younger generations. Surveys organized by well-known organizations showed that life outside work emerged as the most important factor for career decisions. Unexpectedly, this factor came ahead of pay in worker preferences.

So what does there exist new, intense push for grueling schedules? Some hypotheses could account for this behavior. One possibility, it could be the dying breath of a outdated belief – one last push as it winds down. Another view proposes new studies indicating that excessive work can cause mental alterations. Research state that those with extreme schedules show alterations in brain regions associated with cognitive control and emotional regulation. Observing some prominent figures in tech, that idea appears credible. Perhaps only those with such brain changes could consider that this work culture are good or effective.

Since industry insiders typically embrace novelty, it's possible their influenced minds could be convinced that grueling hours are old hat through audacious alternatives. What exactly would be accepted? People imagine three-day weeks, which is close to a thinker's once-predicted 15-hour workweek. Different ideas include a balanced mix of meetings to breaks, or spending one day in the office and more time for oneself. It could be with a catchy name and rumors that it boosts longevity, any of these might emerge as the latest craze in high-pressure sectors.